Mortal Kombat VS DC Universe

8 07 2008

GameTrailers TV has the first in-depth look at the upcoming Mortal Kombat Vs. DC Universe game, due out in November. The video includes interviews with the creator of Mortal Kombat, but more importantly has actual gameplay showcasing Superman, Batman, Catwoman and The Flash from the DC Universe, and Scorpion, Sub-Zero, Sonya, and Shang Tsung on the MK side.

Being an MK player from its inception, I was extremely skeptical as to whether this concept would even remotely work. However, after seeing the game in action, I’m definitely open to it. Some of the action they’ve incorporated is pretty frenetic and hardcore…just like we like our Mortal Kombats. And, despite the lack of an M (Mature) rating, there will be finishing moves…

Ah the important bit…Blood.

Grab The Video Here!

[VIA GAMETRAILERS]





Where The Marvel Universe And Real World Intersect

6 07 2008

Ever wanted to go on a tour of the world that the Marvel superheroes fly around in? Thanks to Flickr member ChildOfAtom, that’s easier than ever. He’s gone to four of the real world addresses of some of the most famous addresses of the Marvel Universe and taken photos of what’s actually there, and posted those photos online along with comparisons to their cartoon counterparts. Want to see what we have instead of the Baxter Building or Daily Bugle offices? Check em out…

Here’s the real life Baxter Building, next to its comic equivalent:

And what can be found at the address of the Daily Bugle?:

Instead of the Avengers Mansion, the real world has this:

And, finally and most depressingly, this is what we get instead of Doctor Strange’s Sanctorum:

And for an added bonus to all the fanboys out there here’s a copy of Wizards “A Guide To Marvels Manhattan” Direct from ‘Wizard’ #199, a handy map that shows exactly where Marvel heroes hang out regularly in the Big Apple!





Essential Comics

4 07 2008

These essential graphic novels are must-reads for anyone interested in comics

  • Watchmen – Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons deconstruct the superhero.
  • Identity Crisis – Brad Metzger and Rags Morales deliver big deaths along with big revelations.

This will be an on going updated list as reviews are added.





Watchmen

4 07 2008

WatchmenI expect everyone to have heard of this one. This seminal work in the history of comics, changed the face of comics for ever. Everyone who has enjoyed Preacher or Transmetropolitan or countless others owes a debt of gratitude to Alan Moore and Watchmen. You see, without Watchmen, none of these titles would probably have existed. Twelve issues, supposedly on a monthly basis when originally published, although delays almost inevitably occurred towards the end of the run. An almost last-minute change to the structure and characters, when DC decided that didn’t want Moore to play around with the Charlton heroes that they’d just purchased (presumably they wanted more than just one appearance from each of those due to be killed off by Moore), and told him he’d need to come up with some originals.

When Watchmen was originally published by DC, the comics world was totally stagnant. The majority of comics were kids’ tales about superheroes, with very little being well-written or thought-provoking. The comics of the time mostly shied away from adult themes as well, and because of this comics were getting a bad name as just being kids’ stuff. Watchmen changed all that and practically single-handedly re-invented comics as a valid art form. OK, so maybe this is a slight exaggeration – it at least served as the catalyst of other, more low-key revolutionary changes, and along with “The Dark Knight Returns”, I think I can safely say without fear of contradiction that Watchmen is the most influential book in the recent history of comics.

The thing about Watchmen is that it’s clever, it has a plot (in fact it has numerous sub-plots), it is set in a modern world and doesn’t view it with rose-tinted spectacles. It deals with adult themes. It covers politics, rape, mass murder, power and numerous other issues, virtually unknown in comicdom prior to its publication. This book is a true work of contemporary art.

However, fashions for modern art have proved intransient, these days no one quite agrees just what art is, so I ask the question exactly how well does Watchmen fare in today’s comics scene? A scene, which is varied and ripe, full of promise, full of comics which are inspired by Watchmen itself? When Watchmen was originally published it has no real competition, but now when there are many varied mature comics does Watchmen still deserve classic status or is it time for us to re-evaluate that? Does Watchmen stand the test of time?

At first glance things are not looking good, the art is, although clearly defined, often garish. It does the job, but it doesn’t sparkle when put next to some of today’s modern titles. In places it does in fact seem ugly. The proof is in the reading, however, and when you start to read Watchmen you realise that the ugliness of the art doesn’t ruin the work, in fact because of the nature of the world Moore has envisaged it compliments it perfectly. The world is ugly and Gibbons is merely illustrating that in a drawn format.

Moore’s world is populated by monsters. Not fantasy monsters with horns, but with real human believable monsters, which are scarier. The main focus of the work is on Rorchach, a masked vigilante who, in confronting monsters, has become something of one himself. The idea that in facing monsters you may become a monster is an ongoing theme throughout the work and Rorchach has many parallels within the story. Watchmen is full of little literary devices such as this.

It is the little touches in Watchmen that make it stand out, for example, the text pages between chapters, which give an impression of gathering evidence for a court. The text pages provide background information and, although, you don’t have to read them to follow the story they can greatly enrich the experience. They certainly make Watchmen all the more believable for them.

And, Watchmen is nothing if not believable, there has evidently been a lot of work gone into this comic to make it as realistic as possible, the only thing that might let it down in that area is some newer readers may not understand the context. Watchmen was written when the shadow of the cold war hung over us all and the threat of nuclear war seemed very, very real. It reflects those times well, but younger readers may not understand the fear that people had in that situation, and the strong feelings that echoed during the time.

Nevertheless, all readers should appreciate the twisting weaving plot structure and well-written dialogue. The story is full of sub-plots and twists yet never lets you forget that you are heading in a very definite direction. It has a flow and the more you read the more you are being pulled along with it, however, Watchmen is never too predictable. It can take your expectations and impressions and turn them inside out with its many plot twists and devices yet this book is always engrossing. The writing of Watchmen is quite simply a work of genius.

This is a brilliant work and although there are many like it now, I think it is still one of the best. This is to be highly recommended to everyone, it is a fantastic work and may it be recognized as such for many years to come.

If you haven’t already bought it, buy it. If you’ve already got it, buy it again.

[VIA COMICSBULLETIN]





Identity Crisis

4 07 2008

Identity CrisisDC is an interesting entity. Human beings learn and evolve thanks to their pasts; they are the sum of their experiences essentially. I pick up something incredibly hot, I get burned and put it down. Yes, I may repeat this almost a hundred times but eventually, after being told, shown and finally tested for myself, I learn the lesson. It’s the way of all creatures I suppose (George W. excluded of course) and yet DC constantly picks at its own history like an unseemly scab. For some bizarre reason, DC feels the need to play around with the past and future, resulting in numerous stories that cause my retinas to burn out with rage as they are rarely handled properly. I think this is typical of comics on the whole, sodding around with the continuity of a hero is a bad idea. An interesting anomaly here is the Sentry, who was woven into the fabric of Marvel’s past very well in his mini (I exclude New Avengers as they have just altered this to remove him from everyone’s memories bar the heroes involved, essentially altering this uniquely handled plot point….hmm). I’m pleased to say that Identity Crisis goes about sorting out some of the weaknesses in the transition from old to new. That can only be a good thing…..can’t it?

The first claim I should make about this story is, readers need to go in emotionally open about it. Try to put yourself in the position of the characters; you’ll find it far more fulfilling, much like eating an Oreo in front of someone on a diet or having sex on your boss’ desk…….with his wife. Second, I am going to reveal the minimum amount possible regarding the story as that is how I read it, with minimal knowledge. Beyond that, I am going to have to at least reveal what I knew beforehand to make this a review worth reading. Otherwise this is just 6 paragraphs of me saying funny things and as hilarious as that is to read, I would have a hard time getting it put on the site.

The story begins with Elongated man, a hero long left out in the cold along with numerous other JLI\JLE members as writers are hard pressed to match the Giffen\De Matteis formula that worked so well in the eighties. The entire story is really about Elongated Man and his wife Sue, though the story is padded out beautifully with additional characters. This reads like a JSA story; it’s all about the past. Moreover it takes the past, spits on it, swipes at it with a rag and actually makes it sparkle a little bit. Ralph reminisces about his life with Sue, how they met and his feelings for her. As I read this, I took a moment to wish I had spent more time reading about them. Oh sure I read the JLI\JLE series but if Meltzer had written a series just about these two with this sort of emotional depth, I would not only read it but marry it also. Now I knew Sue was going to die; I had stumbled across that fact when IC first came out. Unavoidable as a TPB reader. To be honest it is a miracle I didn’t find out everything else that happens, but I was fortunate with this one. All the same it didn’t prepare me for the brutality of what happens to her, nor for Ralph’s naked grief. If you have ever seen a person so totally destroyed they can’t even hold themselves up, be prepared to see it again.

What gets addressed here is some of the weaknesses of the old stories. When the JLA got possessed or their identities were found out, what happened to that knowledge? The book deals with it in the right way I feel. It’s also an appropriate choice of characters for the darker side of this story. Green Arrow, Black Canary, Carter and even Zee to a certain extent could all be considered far more black ops than JLA. They have proven their worth in the past, but also shown they are prepared to be brutal to get the job done. The surprise is the other inclusions, most notably the Atom and Barry Allen. Could they really be a party to this sort of behaviour? You bet, and the story doesn’t hold back in explaining why. We also get to see how organised the heroes are when a crisis of this sort strikes, but not in the way you think. Yes, the security systems of the heroes are impressive and the way they mobilise is equally interesting. However, what the heroes don’t do speaks volumes. Iconic heroes like Superman and Batman are….selective in what they discover. So long as the job gets done, the dirty work can be pushed to the background. Laced throughout the story is betrayal which is presented in spades. It really makes you think about the characters and how they have been forced to tarnish the very ideals they are attempting to safeguard.

The battle between the heroes and Deathstroke is very satisfying. Some of the best the DC universe has to offer go up against a foe we rarely get to see anymore, which is a shame given the way Meltzer handles him. On top of this a small army of heroes spread out looking for clues to the crime and get nowhere. There is an obvious sense of panic here, and it’s orchestrated well, illustrating people on the brink, trying to maintain the aura of calm.

Where the story really stands out though is in the human tragedy of it all. I am a big fan of titanic battles, of seeing Superman (who I readily admit I don’t actually like) get hit and not miss a bit. It gives a child-like giddy thrill which is quite satisfying. This story provides this but in minimal amounts. Instead, a soap opera style story unfolds and for once, I’m not flicking to the soccer. The intensity and focus does fluctuate though. The Firestorm situation is weak compared to, say, the Atom and his ex-wife. Something I never saw coming and was pleasantly surprised. The most shocking, most poignant and most memorable part of the entire story has to be Batman and Robin racing back to Tim’s apartment. The fear is palpable and all over Batman’s face, a single panel that will stick with me for some time I am sure. It is just one of the brilliant moments featured in this story which makes the heroes seem really vulnerable. Not vulnerable against some vast enemy or some unconquerable evil, but against their own fears and insecurities. The bonds between them get so stretched you think they might snap. Of course they don’t, but for a second there…

[VIA COMICSBULLETIN]





Final Crisis #1

4 07 2008

Final Crisis #1DC Comics has two new mega-events rolling this summer: One is a cosmic event that promises to recalibrate the DC Universe yet again (Final Crisis — “That trick never works!” says pint-sized skeptic Rocket J. Squirrel), and the other is an exploration of the core DC hero dynamic, running once a week for a year (Trinity). Both events spur further thought on the current superheroic environment in terms of publishing and the real world. Here I cover the first; watch for my review of Trinity coming soon.

There’s a great British phrase that reminds me of about half of the current crop of superhero comic books: “too clever by half.” Roughly translated, it means “to be too confident of your own intelligence in a way that annoys other people.” Sadly, Final Crisis #1 falls into this category, and I really wish it didn’t.

I really enjoy these superhero cosmic “let’s change everything (but not really)” smash-your-head-against-the-wall epic saga thingies. I liked them so much, I even edited one of them (Zero Hour, 1994), although I came to regret much of it later. I don’t really care much for the more recent ones, however. Mostly, because I can’t understand what’s going on in them anymore. Which brings us to another well-turned phrase: “It’s not on the page.”

A large part of this is in the way that comic book storytelling has evolved over the years, eliminating some of the very tools that serve as the basics of communication. Footnotes are now extinct. Thought balloons were removed completely, replaced with way-overused first-person narrative or color-coded or iconic captions that you have to stop and graphically decipher. (Let’s not even talk about Bendis’ ballyhooed return of the thought balloon as a gage for how horny each of your characters are. How we have progressed!) And Kirby-forbid if the writer should actually deign to refer to his characters by name (or even by caption) somewhere (anywhere!) during the story.
I had to learn elsewhere (Newsarama) that the caveman wearing the preppy sweater in the opening pages of Final Crisis was Vandal Savage. Vandal also appears later (and is identified by name), as a part of the supervillain group that is meeting with Libra, but there is no indication anywhere that the two characters are one and the same and that he is immortal (although implied in dialog). I know this because I’ve been reading DC comics for 45 years and have read many stories about the character. Lord help the person who, attracted by the glossy bookstore-style design of the Chip Kidd-styled cover, is picking up their very first comic book.

And then we come to the Human Flame, a loser villain who is apparently instrumental in killing the Martian Manhunter. Although Libra actually does the dastardly deed, indicating his obvious “control freak” tendencies, while poor ol’ Flamey is left to snap the death photo on his cellphone. What, you’ve never heard of the Human Flame before? Why, he was the first supervillain MM ever met (as we found out in the previous week’s “cover-your-butt” Justice League of America story). In neither comic do we learn that the Human Flame last appeared in Detective Comics #274 (December 1959), which probably no one on earth either read or remembered until it was recently reprinted in Showcase: Martian Manhunter.

The less said about the Martian Manhunter’s death, the better. Other than “yawn” and he’s been dead before…

Unfortunately, the book is full of yawn moments: the New Gods as gangsters, whatever the hell is going on with the Monitors (who just, and always have, look boring), and the whole scene with “Man” (oh, sorry, Anthro) and the other long-haired kid (Kamandi), who thankfully brought along his handy Statue of Liberty from his first issue cover to help identify him.

Not everything here is disappointing. J.G. Jones’ art is as beautiful as ever, although his continuity chops may be a bit rusty as a few storytelling choices seemed a bit flat, especially for the Martian Manhunter’s death scene (or maybe I was just expecting something more iconic or memorable?). Grant Morrison’s reputation as an “idea factory” is largely upheld here, with dozens of new concepts on display, although one wishes a bit more information. Or clarity. Put it on the page, please!

I had to find out from the internet what Anthro was drawing in the sand, and it’s a good thing I did, because I also found out that the story really ramps up in its third issue! Meaning I have to be 12 bucks into the story before anything exciting happens?

Plus, there was the Newsarama interview about why the the New Gods continuity was all screwed up. Writer Morrison’s explanation: He wrote it over a year ago and couldn’t change it. Which begs the question about why the DC Editorial powers-that-be didn’t do anything to make sure that material in Countdown or The Death of the New Gods didn’t contradict any of Grant’s stuff. Maybe they just didn’t care.

If they don’t care, why should we? And why should I have to have a computer handy just to enjoy a comic book story? Consider this, publishers: if your comics can’t be understood without resorting to the internet, don’t be so surprised when readers decide to stop buying the book and just download it. And you pointed them at the tool to accomplish this.

[VIA COMICS WORTH READING]